Geobear’s solutions have been assessed by Carbon Footprint Ltd and are certified to emit significantly less carbon in comparison to traditional methods. A number of reports have been collated by Carbon Footprint Ltd and KLH Sustainability regarding the carbon emissions of Geobear solutions in comparison to traditional methods.
This report is a comparison of the standard Geobear geopolymer injection service vs traditional highway concrete bay replacement.
The assessment focuses on the embodied raw material emissions, the transport of these materials, and the manufacture/processing, distribution and disposal of the two services. The Geobear method extends the lifetime of the existing asset, whereas the traditional replacement method, results in a brand-new asset.
The Geobear Geopolymer Injection service produces less emissions than the traditional method. 5 Geobear treatments result in the avoidance of 62.43% of the modelled traditional method’s emissions.
This report provides a comparison of the standard Geobear Geopolymer Injection service vs a traditional Piled Raft. It analyses the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the Geobear Geopolymer Injection service and a traditional Piled Raft method. This assessment focuses on the embodied raw material emissions, the transport of these materials, the manufacture/processing, distribution and disposal of the two services.
The carbon footprint of the Geobear Geopolymer Injection service produces 34.26% less emissions than the traditional method.
All terms of use are certified. Copyright. Geobear 2024.
